For special applications, PVD coatings are now applied on a small scale. The coatings that are mainly applied so far are: B4C, WC-C:H (or W-DLC), and CrN. Bodycote’s U.S. operations, formerly known as Diamond Black Technologies, has played a pioneering role in demonstrating the capabilities of PVD coatings, especially B4C.
In collaboration with Hauzer, Bodycote’s European operations has broad industrial experience with WC-C:H coatings and CrN coatings. The effects of PVD coatings on gears will be discussed in this article, as well as some examples of PVD coatings.
Pitting, or rolling contact fatigue is one of the primary failure modes. Fatigue cracks form in the contact surface and are then filled with small-particle debris. This failure mode is linked with contact pressure: If the contact pressure is kept below a threshold value, this type of failure can be avoided. This can be achieved by proper dimensioning of the gears; the contact pressure should be kept relatively low by using wider gears, for example.
Root bending failure, resulting in complete removal of the tooth, is another failure mode, which is mainly caused by fatigue cracking of the tooth-root. It is also linked mainly to gear design, including the base material.
Micro-pitting and scuffing can lead to another failure mechanism. Scuffing leads to adhesive wear, resulting in tooth deformation and eventually large chipping. Micro-pitting results in the formation of fatigue cracks, giving rise to macro-pitting. Both micro-pitting and scuffing have mainly to do with the surface structure. Parameters like surface roughness, hardness of the surface and sub-surface of the two counter materials, friction coefficient, and hence lubrication film thickness all play a role. The local stresses, initiated by the surface roughness, quite often are considerably larger than the Hertzian stresses, even when the gears are grounded (Figure 1).
Especially with the carburized gears that are currently in use, the surface effects play a dominant role.
Effects of PVD Coatings
Physical Vapor Deposited (PVD) coatings can be used mainly to influence the near-surface properties, such as:
- surface hardness
- surface roughness
- friction coefficient
- oil wettability
Surface hardness: The hardness of PVD coatings can be matched, for example, from 1,100 Vickers to 4,000 Vickers. A high hardness reduces the abravise wear of the coated surface. Typically the abrasive wear scales inversely with surface hardness, so a wear reduction of the coated part is expected when they are PVD coated.
Surface roughness: PVD coatings do not have a levelling or smoothing effect, as do galvanic coatings. Generally PVD magnetron coatings increase the “peak to peak toughness” Rz with 0.1- 0.3 µm per µm film thickness. It’s even worse for PVD-ARC coatings when pure metal droplets are introduced into the coating, resulting in a peak to peak roughness Rz increase of typically 1 µm per µm film thickness. Still, coatings can be used to reduce the effects of surface roughness. A surface with a high hardness will influence the wear behavior of the uncoated counterpart. Normally one would expect an increased wear of the uncoated counterpart. When properly done, however, the coating can have a polishing effect, initially resulting in a high wear of the counterpart, followed by low wear due to the well-polished surface.
Friction coefficient: The friction coefficient of PVD coatings can range from 0.1 to 0.8. Typical values for W-DLC (W containing diamond-like carbon, or WC-C:H) are between 0.1 and 0.2 .
A reduced friction coefficient will also result in lower micro-pitting. This is especially important when there is a compromise of lubrication conditions. It has been demonstrated by Murakawa et al. (2) that when a loss-of-lubrication stuation occurs after a period of normal lubrication, surface improvements may extend the time period for running before catastrophic failure occurs. The two surface improvement methods they have investigated are:
Micro Shot-Peening (MSP), which involves a mixture of metallic and ceramic powder with particle size 40-100 µm being shot-peened onto a grounded gear surface, resulting in a gear surface without grinding traces. The MSP treatment alone hardly increased the lifetime under dry conditions, and;
PVD Coating: WC-C:H coatings were used to coat both untreated gears and MSP treated gears. The PVD coating prolonged the running time under loss-of-lubricant conditions by a factor of two to three, relative to the uncoated gear. Combination of an MSP and PVD coating prolonged the running time considerably.
Figure 1 shows the results obtained by Murakawa et al. The Lloyds factor K (in MPa) is a measure of the contact pressure on the gear surface.
K = 10T/2R2 b(i+1)/i, with
T = transferred torque (N.m)
R = radius of reference circle for the drive side of the gear (mm)
b = gear face width
i = gear ratio
Oil wettability: While additives are normally mixed with the gear lubricant, there is an environmentally driven tendency to reduce these additives. It has been demonstrated by Weck et al. (3-5) that the role of additives can partly be replaced by WC-C:H coatings, or W-DLC. Biodegradable synthetic esther oils, in combination with WC-C:H PVD coated gears, have a similar or improved performance as compared to regular oil with additives and uncoated gears.
Examples of PVD coatings
PVD coatings that are currently applied in the industry for gear coating and relevant properties are presented in the following table: Table 1
Typical production units are shown in the Figure 2 on the next page. A cross-section of the unit is given in Figure 3. The step to deposit hydrogenated DLC is important, for during this step carbon is coming mainly from a carbon-containing gas like acetylene.
To create the right coating properties, it is important to have a proper plasma density. In the Hauzer units, this is generally achieved by having closed magnetic field lines from one cathode to the next. Along these field lines electrons spiralize and reflect close to the cathodes. Consequently, the plasma density is increased. High plasma densities are necessary for the formation of sufficient carbon atoms and radicals. The coating can be optimized for different applications. Typically, a W-DLC coating can be optimized for fatigue properties or for abrasive wear properties. Strondl et al. (6) have described that a standard W-DLC process can be modified by simply changing the multilayer structure. At low rotation speeds, a pronounced multi-layer structure is formed, enhancing the fatigue properties. At high rotation speed, a uniform structure is formed, with nano-sized WC crystallites in an amorphous DLC matrix that is superior in abrasive wear resistance. Figure 4
This is illustrated in the following figures, where properties such as hardness are shown for three rotation speeds.
Future Outlook for Coating of Gears
So far, the coating of gears has only been applied in cases where the additional cost of PVD coating was less than having to redesign the gear box, or where the extra performance with PVD coatings under loss-of-lubrication conditions is valuable. The application so far has been limited to a small percentage of gear boxes. Cost effectiveness is critical for a wider application of this solution. Here, PVD as a developing technology is still improving. There are a number of reasons why the use of PVD coatings may become more widespread in the gear industry:
The average cost of PVD in modern large-scale production units is considerably less now than in recent years. Historically, PVD prices have been reduced by a factor of two every five years. Figure 5
The industry is focusing on reducing the number of different designs for all major components. Major industries are working on a limited number of platforms, as well as a limited number of gear boxes. This means that the torque in a given size of gear box may reach the limits for uncoated gears. Figure 6
Longterm, environmental regulations will force the industry to use less-harmfull products, which would force manufacturers to address wetting behavior not through additives, but through the surface structure for the heaviest-loaded gears.
1) C.M.R. Wilkinson, A.V. Oliver. Tribology Transactions. 42: (1999) 503-510
2) M. Murakawa, T. Komori, S. Takeuchi, K. Miyoshi. Surface and Coatings Technology, 120-121: (1999) 646-652.
3) O. Hurasky-Sch–nwerth, M. Weck. “PVD-coatings and synthetic ester in the tribological system of gear contact” (in German), Tagungsband 41, Arbeitstagung: ‘Zahnrad und Getriebeuntersuchungen,’ WZL, RWTH Aachen 2000.
4) O. Hurasky-Sch–nwerth, M. Weck. “Behavior of PVD-coatings in rolling contact” (in German), Tagungsband 40, Arbeitstagung: ‘Zahnrad und Getriebeuntersuchungen,’ WZL, RWTH Aachen 1999.
5) M. Weck, O. Hurasky-Sch–nwerth. “Environmentally compatible tribo-systems in gearing,” Proc. 4th World congress on gearing and power transmission, Paris 1999, p. 2159-2172.
6) C. Strondl, G.J. van der Kolk, T. Hurkmans, N.M. Carvalho, J.Th.M. de Hosson. Surf. and Coat. Technol. 707: (2001) 142-144.
7) C. Strondl, N.M. Carvalho, J.Th.M. de Hosson, G.J. van der Kolk. Surf. and Coat. Technol. 162: (2003) 288-293.